<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blasphemy Day 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.betterthanfaith.com/news/blasphemy-day-2009/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.betterthanfaith.com/news/blasphemy-day-2009</link>
	<description>Never Stop Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lykeros</title>
		<link>http://www.betterthanfaith.com/news/blasphemy-day-2009/comment-page-1#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>Lykeros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterthanfaith.com/?p=290#comment-852</guid>
		<description>I like Blasphemy Day, but I believe that it should definitely be refined. I think it is best served as an open declaration that nothing should be free from criticism and that nothing should be considered &quot;blasphemy&quot; whether it is against a deity or even the government. There should not be a word or words that are so awful that should you utter them, you should be damned.

I prefer to be an open opportunity skeptic. Rather than just focus on Christianity (or Islam), why not challenge all of the superstitious beliefs? I try to make sure that I point out that it is not just belief in one specific god or gods, but the whole realm of unsupported, unscientific beliefs that I challenge.

Why should only religion get singled out for being based in superstition and faith? It shouldn&#039;t. Things such as homeopathy, faith healing, astrology, etc. need to be challenged as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Blasphemy Day, but I believe that it should definitely be refined. I think it is best served as an open declaration that nothing should be free from criticism and that nothing should be considered &#8220;blasphemy&#8221; whether it is against a deity or even the government. There should not be a word or words that are so awful that should you utter them, you should be damned.</p>
<p>I prefer to be an open opportunity skeptic. Rather than just focus on Christianity (or Islam), why not challenge all of the superstitious beliefs? I try to make sure that I point out that it is not just belief in one specific god or gods, but the whole realm of unsupported, unscientific beliefs that I challenge.</p>
<p>Why should only religion get singled out for being based in superstition and faith? It shouldn&#8217;t. Things such as homeopathy, faith healing, astrology, etc. need to be challenged as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vocab</title>
		<link>http://www.betterthanfaith.com/news/blasphemy-day-2009/comment-page-1#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>Vocab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.betterthanfaith.com/?p=290#comment-851</guid>
		<description>I think this might be a great idea if more freedom-loving atheists would re-direct their energies towards the real threat - Islam.  I think it would be fantastic to see more reasoned-driven blasphemy of this religion.  So, have at it, ladies and gents!
vM!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this might be a great idea if more freedom-loving atheists would re-direct their energies towards the real threat &#8211; Islam.  I think it would be fantastic to see more reasoned-driven blasphemy of this religion.  So, have at it, ladies and gents!<br />
vM!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

