Resurrection Debate – Vocab’s Rebuttal to Tim’s Opening Statement
It strikes me as strange that in a debate centered on history, Tim has devoted so much of his time to psychology. His main argument seems to go something like this:
- Lots of people believe lots of things that never happened
- Lots of people believe the resurrection happened
- The resurrection must have never happened
Even though I am slightly lampooning it, this still is not a particularly good or relevant argument. As such, I am going to deal with the more pertinent points Tim raised.